Blog

Smartphone screens explained: AMOLED, Mini LED, Retina, LTPO, and more | nextpit

Smartphone display acronyms can be a little overwhelming—AMOLED, miniLED, LCD, LED, IPS, TFT, PLS, LTPO2...—but if you want to know what all the numbers and abbreviations associated with smartphone screens mean, we've got you covered. Want to know what each screen type is best for and what the differences in screen resolution mean? Keep reading to know more.

As if the number of available technologies wasn't enough, marketing departments in component and phone manufacturers slap increasingly hyperbolic names such as "Super Retina XDR" and "Dynamic AMOLED 2x", which only leads to more and more confusion. So we will try to cover the most popular names slapped on technical spec sheets as well. HDMI LCD Module

Smartphone screens explained: AMOLED, Mini LED, Retina, LTPO, and more | nextpit

In short, there are two kinds of technologies available in the market for smartphone displays: LCD and OLED. Each of them has several variations and generations, which gives rise to more acronyms, similar to televisions and their different ranges such as LED, QLED, and Mini LED—which are actually variations of LCD technology.

LCD means Liquid Crystal Display and its name refers to the array of liquid crystals illuminated by a backlight, and their ubiquity and relatively low cost make them a popular choice for smartphones and many other devices.

Modern LCDs rely on a TFT (Thin Film Transistor) layer, with an active matrix that saves cost and complexity in comparison to old, low-resolution, passive displays, such as those commonly found in calculators, older watches, and even the original Game Boy.

On a TFT, each pixel doesn't need a dedicated connection to receive the necessary voltage to be turned on or off, with tiny transistors controlling the current received on each row and column of pixels.

As a general advantage, LCDs tend to perform quite well in direct sunlight, as the entire display is illuminated from behind but do suffer from potentially less accurate color representation than displays that don't require a backlight.

Speaking about backlight, the question above became very common after "LED" TVs were launched, with the short answer simply being LCD. The technology used in a LED (light-emitting diode) display is still liquid crystal, the difference being LEDs generating the backlight.

LEDs have the advantage of consuming very little power—which explains the emphasis given by marketing departments in highlighting the term in TVs, but not so much when it comes to smartphones with their reduced display size. On the other hand, backlight operation makes it difficult for LCD/LED displays to offer a level of contrast that is competitive with OLED displays since the lighting control is not performed by each individual pixel, but by regions on the displays.

IPS technology (In-Plane Switching) solves the problem that the first generation of TFT LCD displays experienced, which adopts the TN (Twisted Nematic) technique: where color distortion occurs when you view the display from the side—an effect that continues to crop up on cheaper smartphones and tablets.

In IPS panels, the liquid crystals are aligned to the display, resulting in superior viewing angles—usually listed at 178º on TVs. Another characteristic of IPS displays in relation to other LCD technologies is superior color reproduction, which explains the use of such panels in monitors that are meant for image editing jobs.

IPS displays are usually associated with LG—even though it was invented by Hitachi—so Samsung Displays created a very similar technology called PLS (Plane to Line Switching). Samsung argues its technology offers higher brightness levels and superior angles, but in the end, both technologies offer generally the same characteristics.

Presented as the next-big-thing-® in 2021, Mini LEDs were first seen on televisions but soon reached mobile devices with Apple's iPad Pro 12.9'' (2021). Despite the marketing hype, Mini LED screens are basically LCD panels with more LEDs on the backlight.

The result is greater control over contrast levels in different areas of the display, with more backlight sections on the screen. Another advantage highlighted by Apple for the new iPad is a higher peak brightness—up to 1,600 nits in HDR mode, versus 600 nits for the previous generation.

Despite the improvement in terms of contrast (and potentially brightness) over traditional LCD/LED displays, Mini LEDs still divide the screen into brightness zones—over 2,500 in the case of the iPad and some "QNED" TVs from LG—compared to dozens or hundreds of zones in previous-generation FALD (full-array local dimming) displays, on which the LEDs are behind the LCD panel instead of the edges.

However, for even greater contrast control, done individually at each point on the screen, it is necessary to go to panels equipped with microLED technologies—still cost-prohibitive in 2021—or OLED.

OLED stands for Organic Light Emitting Diode. An OLED display is comprised of thin sheets of electroluminescent material that, as the name implies, emits light when a current is passed through it. As opposed to LCD panels, which are backlit, OLED displays are 'always off' unless the individual pixels are powered.

This means that OLED displays have much purer blacks and consume less energy when black or darker colors are displayed on-screen. However, lighter-colored themes on OLED screens use considerably more power than an LCD using the same theme. OLED screens are also more expensive to produce than LCDs.

Because the black pixels are 'off' in an OLED display, the contrast ratios are also higher compared to LCD screens. OLED displays can have a very fast refresh rate too, but on the downside are not quite as visible in direct sunlight as backlit LCDs. Screen burn-in and diode degradation (because they are organic) are other factors to consider.

On the positive side, OLED screens can be made thinner than LCDs (because they don't require a backlight layer) and they can also be made flexible.

AMOLED (Active Matrix OLED) uses a TFT layer like in LCDs to control individual pixels, instead of PMOLEDs (passive matrix OLED), which drives the display on the row and line level. The result is similar to LCDs, allowing for denser and bigger displays. As a rule of thumb, all OLED screens on the market today are variations of the AMOLED technology.

There are whispers going around that smartphones and smartwatches will be looking at incorporating microLED technology in their devices soon, with it being radically different from LCD/LED displays as it sports similar image characteristics to that of OLEDs.

A microLED display has one light-emitting diode for each subpixel of the screen—usually a set of red, green, and blue diodes for each dot. Chances are it will use a kind of inorganic material such as gallium nitride (GaN).

By adopting a self-emitting light technology, microLED displays do not require the use of a backlight, with each pixel being "turned off" individually. The result is impressive: your eyes see the same level of contrast as OLED displays, without suffering from the risk of image retention or burn-in of organic diodes.

Another advantage of microLED technology is the potential to display images with higher brightness levels while benefitting from lower power consumption, combining the strengths of both OLED and LCD panels.

On the other hand, the use of multiple diodes for each pixel poses a challenge in terms of component miniaturization. For example, a Full HD resolution has just over two million pixels (1,920 x 1,080 dots), which requires 6 million microscopic LEDs using a traditional RGB (red, green, and blue) structure.

This is one of the reasons that explain the adoption of such technology to date remains rather limited in scope. You will see them mainly on large screens of 75 to 150 inches only, which enable 4K resolution (3,840 x 2,160 resolution, which is close to 8.3 million pixels or 24.8 million RGB subpixels). This is a huge number of pixels to look at!

Despite having around half a dozen display suppliers and a limited number of technologies at hand, marketing departments on phone brands try to one-up each other every launch season by coining increasingly creative terms to seduce customers—as they are (handsomely) paid to do—and that results in tons of additional names on spec sheets:

All marketing aside, there are additional specifications that actually matter when shopping for a new device:

Resolution describes the number of individual pixels (or points) displayed on the screen and is usually presented for phones by the number of horizontal pixels—vertical when referring to TVs and monitors. More pixels on the same display allow for more detailed images and clearer text.

To make it easier to compare different models, brands usually adopt the same naming scheme made popular by the TV market with terms like HD, FullHD, and UltraHD. But with phones adopting a wide range of different screen proportions, just knowing that is not enough to know the total pixels displayed on the screen.

But resolution in itself is not a good measure for image clarity, for that we need to consider the display size, resulting in the pixel density by area measured by DPI/PPI (dots/points per inch).

Popularized in 2019 and 2020 by high-end and even some mid-range smartphones, the terms "120 Hz", "90 Hz" and others with a similar measurement in Hertz represent the refresh rate of the panel, be it LCD or OLED. The higher the value, the more frames per second are displayed on the screen.

The result is smoother animations on the phone, both during regular use and in games, compared to screens that have a 60 Hz refresh rate which remains the standard rate in the market when it comes to displays.

Originally touted to be a "gimmick" in 2017, with the launch of the Razer Phone, the feature gained more and more momentum in due time, even with a corresponding decrease in battery life. In order to make the most of this feature, manufacturers began to adopt screens with variable refresh rates, which can be adjusted according to the content displayed—which is 24 fps in most movies, 30 or 60 fps in home video recordings, and so forth.

The same unit of measurement is used for the sampling rate. Although similar, the value here represents the number of times per second the screen is able to register touches. The higher the sample rate, the faster the smartphone registers such touches, which results in a faster response time.

Nit, or candela per square meter in the international system (cd/m²), is a unit of measurement of luminance, i.e. the intensity of light emitted. In the case of smartphone screens and monitors in general, such a value defines just how bright the display is—the higher the value, the more intense the light emitted by the screen.

In product descriptions, brightness is usually presented in different scenarios:

As if all the terminology above weren't enough, there are a couple of additional acronyms that you may come across while checking a spec sheet:

LTPO allows the display to adjust its refresh rate, adapting dynamically to the content shown. Scrolling pages can trigger the fastest mode for fluid viewing, while displaying a static image allows the phone to use a lower refresh rate, saving battery.

In 2022, flagship phones started using version 2.0 of the LTPO technology, whose main advantage is being able to go down to a 1 Hz refresh rate, instead of the 10 Hz available in first-generation LTPO panels. Found in phones like the OnePlus 10 Pro, iPhone 14 Pro, and the Galaxy S23 Ultra, LTPO 2.0 promises even further energy savings.

While this article's previous version still highlighted the battle between LCDs and OLEDs in the phone market, ever since Apple adopted OLEDs on the iPhone X, the trend is clear. LCDs/LEDs are been relegated to entry-level devices. The only holdouts so far are screens between 10 and 19 inches, which until very recently didn't have large-scale production for OLEDs.

That is probably the reason why iPads are still using LCD panels—although with flagship mini LED backlighting—one of the few high-end consumer devices still on the tech. But even the tablet space is showing signs of an OLED takeover, with rivals such as the Galaxy S8 Ultra NextPit reviewed last year powered by OLED panels.

Still, flexible displays and all the rumors around Micro LEDs show that there is still a lot of research going on when it comes to electronic screens, and we will probably have a lot of new technologies to learn (and write) about.  

This article was updated in April 2023, older comments were preserved and may refer to outdated versions of this guide.

Having written about technology since 2008 for a number of websites in Brazil, Spain, Denmark, and Germany, I specialize in the mobile ecosystem, including various models, components, and apps. I tend to not only value performance and specifications, but also things like repairability, durability, and manufacturer support. I tend to prioritize the end-user's point of view whenever possible.

Very nice and helpful. Thank you.

Excellent description of complex, technical info.

WTF !man ???! so for u lcd, amoled, ips it's a marketing name like retina ???! r u crazy ? is this a trick to put apple on same level with big hardware companies ! absolutely useless article, confusing an BS !!

which is better LCD 120HZ Display or SUPER AMOLED Display ?

Great article on types of screens.

Hey Ben! Great article! Do you have an email? I'd like to pick your brain about certain screens for a health issue. I need help in identifying why certain screens give me intense eye pain when I look at them and others do not. I'm having trouble finding a newer cell phone I can tolerate, even with blocking blue light, filters, changing setting etc. I'd appreciate anyone who could help! Thanks :)

Very useful article. Well done. Personally, I'm perfectly happy with a 1080p AMOLED. No need for a 2K/4K screen on a phone. They just drain the battery faster, that's all.

Nice Post, Got detail information about types of display. Keep it up, Good job

Thanks, as complete an article as I've seen on this. One thing worth mentioning, especially as we hear more and more complaining about battery life and all know that screen time is the single biggest battery factor, is that there's a big difference in battery drain between hi-res and lower end screens. On that factor, I've never read a serious lab comparison, but heavy users who have the screen on a lot of the day really ought to ask themselves whether the incremental improvement in display is worth increased battery anxieties. (I rarely watch small screen video, but watched an action flick on a 1280 x 720 tablet out on a garden lounge last evening - perfectly enjoyable, and barely moved the 3000mAh battery.)

I have iphone 7 and Note edge on hand. the noted edge is 2 years old. everything in iPhone im satisfied but the retina display, the display is totally cannot compare with my old note edge AMOLED display. when you are scrolling fb or webpage u will definitely feel the different. in iPhone, u r definitely not able reading and scrolling at the same time. but in AMOLED device, it is not an issues. I only realized that when I got my iPhone 7 last year with my usual reading and scrolling style. then I sudden feel like "I can't read at all", that time onwards, I do all my scrolling and reading in my old Note edge... try it urself, retina display cannot handle reading while in scrolling style. in retina screen you have to stop scrolling while reading. in AMOLED, reading while scrolling is not a problem.

Refresh rate is the culprit.

Any way of finding out the frame rate of these displays

in AMOLED, reading while scrolling is not a problem. but iPhone retina screen will make your eyes blur if you have tried

I enjoyed your article, great job!

By clicking on the button above, you agree that external content may be displayed to you. Personal data may be transmitted to third-party providers in the process. You can find more information about this in our Privacy Policy.

It only takes a moment to join the community!

It only takes a moment to join the conversation!

Your comment will be waiting.

Already registered? Log in here

ID4me is an internet service that enables its users to log in to many different internet services with one account. This is also known as "single sign on".

Unlike existing global single sign on solutions like the ones from Google or Facebook, ID4me does not track and analyze the internet surfing habits of its users. ID4me will make sure that the surfing habits stay secret.

Also, ID4me does not belong to an enterprise. It is an open standard that is maintained by a nonprofit organization. Anyone who wants to can participate. This way the users can chose freely between different ID4me providers and can also change the provider anytime.

Further information can be found here: https://id4me.org/

Smartphone screens explained: AMOLED, Mini LED, Retina, LTPO, and more | nextpit

T5L EVALUATION BOARD The last section of the technical overview explains how to set up an ID4me account: https://id4me.org/documents